#Congress, #Government, #Headlines, #MiddleEast, #People, #politics, #TheNewz, #Trump

Graham says U.S. should ‘sanction the hell out of Saudi Arabia’

?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2

Sen. Lindsey Graham on Tuesday said the U.S. should “sanction the hell out of Saudi Arabia” and vowed to never work with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as long as he remains in charge of the country, slamming him as “toxic” and a “wrecking ball.”

The disappearance of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, a vocal critic of the 33-year-old crown prince and royal family, ignited an international uproar after he was last seen at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul two weeks ago.

“He had this guy murdered in a consulate in Turkey,” Graham said on “Fox and Friends” on Tuesday. “And to expect me to ignore it, I feel used and abused. I was on the floor every time defending Saudi Arabia because they’re a good ally.”

Turkish officials have said they believe Khashoggi was murdered by Saudi officials, but President Donald Trump has told reporters that King Salman vehemently denies those accusations. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo went to Saudi Arabia on Monday as the kingdom is expected to explain the journalist’s disappearance.

“I’m not going back to Saudi Arabia if this guy’s in charge,” Graham said. “He can never be a world leader on the world stage,” he said of the crown prince.

“We deal with bad people all the time,” Graham said. “This is in our face. I feel personally offended. They have nothing but contempt for us.”

“This guy has got to go. Saudi Arabia, if you’re listening. There’s a lot of good people you can choose, but MBS has tainted your country,” he said, referring to the crown prince’s moniker.

Source: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/16/graham-sanction-saudi-arabia-905641

#BusinessNews, #Headlines, #MiddleEast, #TheNewz

Rising tensions between US & Saudi Arabia over Khashoggi case rock oil prices

Preview Crude prices were surging on Monday as the rift between Saudi Arabia and the United States heats up. As Washington considers sanctions against Riyadh over a missing journalist, the future of the oil market is in question.
Read Full Article at RT.com

Source: https://www.rt.com/business/441283-saudi-arabia-oil-sanctions/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

#Headlines, #MiddleEast, #Terrorism, #TheNewz, #Trending, #WorldNews

Iran mourns terror attack victims, as confusion swirls over Isis’s claim of responsibility

ahvaz-12.jpg

The men in the Isis video, speaking Arabic and Persian, never mention Isis or make a religiously valid oath loyalty to the group

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-attack-terror-isis-responsible-military-parade-victims-dead-a8552596.html

#Headlines, #MiddleEast, #TheNewz, #WorldNews

Iran points finger at US allies over deadly attack

Iran points finger at US allies over deadly attackIranian President Hassan Rouhani on Sunday pointed blame at Arab separatists for a deadly attack on a military parade and accused an unnamed US-backed Gulf state of supporting them. Tehran also summoned diplomats from Denmark, the Netherlands and Britain for allegedly hosting members of the group suspected of links to Saturday’s attack that killed 24 people, according to a revised death toll. Four militants attacked a parade commemorating the start of the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war in the southwestern city of Ahvaz, capital of the border province of Khuzestan.

Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/iran-points-finger-arab-separatists-deadly-attack-103209155.html

#Headlines, #MiddleEast, #politics, #TheNewz, #Trump, #WorldNews

Foreign policy bigwigs: Trump risking war with Iran

?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2

President Donald Trump is risking a potential war with Iran unless he engages the Islamist-led country using diplomacy, not just pressure tactics, dozens of prominent U.S. foreign policy, intelligence and national security figures argue in a new public statement.

The statement, released by a group calling itself the National Coalition to Prevent an Iranian Nuclear Weapon, comes as Trump prepares to speak at the annual United Nations General Assembly. Iran is expected to be a hot topic during this week’s U.N. gathering of world leaders, many of whom are upset that Trump pulled the United States out of the Iran nuclear deal.

The statement, shared first with POLITICO, is unusual in that it acknowledges the legitimacy of Trump’s criticisms of Iran’s overall behavior, even as it pushes the president to rethink his strategy.

“Applying pressure and unilateral sanctions without viable diplomatic options … could lead to a more dangerous, destructive and enduring regional conflict with Iran,” argue the more than 50 people who signed the statement.

Among the signatories: former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who served Republican and Democratic presidents; former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who served in the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton; and former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, who served the GOP White House of George W. Bush.

The letter offers tacit agreement with many of the Trump administration’s criticisms of Iran, whose government is a leading backer of terrorist groups and has links to militias well beyond its borders.

The signatories insist, however, that the administration’s goal of reining in Iran “can only be achieved through a strategy that is both multilateral — engaging close allies and other powers — and which combines pressure and diplomacy.”

The administration’s approach so far, which does not include diplomatic outreach of any significance, “has left Iran the option of either capitulation or war,” the statement declares.

Signers say Trump should re-enter the Iran nuclear deal, in part to get build international backing for moves aimed at reining in Iran’s non-nuclear activities.

The nuclear agreement, reached in 2015 under former President Barack Obama, gave Iran relief on sanctions in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program. Trump blasted the deal as being too narrow because it did not address Iran’s ballistic missile program, sponsorship of terrorism or other activities.

Trump quit the deal in May and has since been re-imposing sanctions on Iran. The U.S. also has laid out a list of demands on the regime in Tehran that require such drastic changes in its behavior that many analysts say it’s effectively a call for regime change.

Some opponents of Iran’s theocratic rulers, in and outside the U.S. government, believe that the regime in Tehran is weaker than it appears, and that sufficient pressure on the country through sanctions, support for dissidents and other actions could directly or indirectly lead to its collapse.

But those who signed on to the new statement assert that that belief “reflects wishful thinking and a flawed interpretation of intelligence about Iran’s vulnerability.”

“While Iran’s economy is under increasing stress and there are many signs of discontent among its population, the regime remains strong, well-armed and united against outside threat,” they say.

The statement also draws on recent U.S. history to warn against over-confidence.

“The 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq remains a striking reminder of our inability to estimate accurately the long-term impact of U.S. actions,” it reads.

Source: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/23/trump-iran-war-foreign-policy-836411