Thousands of indigenous Peruvian women say they were forcibly sterilised in a state family planning scheme.
Thousands of indigenous Peruvian women say they were forcibly sterilised in a state family planning scheme.
Around the world, most campaigns last a few weeks. In the US, it’s a different story – here’s why.
The White House’s verbal gymnastics over Russia’s alleged campaign to hack American democracy threaten to obscure a basic fact: U.S. authorities have laid out a wealth of details about how they believe Moscow carried out its plot in 2016.
And, they say, Moscow is continuing to meddle in this year’s elections.
The U.S. intelligence community has offered specifics about the 2016 plot, which are also outlined in special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s indictments against Russian spies and internet saboteurs — conclusions that congressional leaders of both parties have endorsed.
That leaves one prominent waffler: President Donald Trump, who has said both that Russia “would” or “wouldn’t” have tried to tamper in the 2016 election, and whose staff was scrambling Wednesday to explain whether he thinks Russia continues to target the U.S.
This is the picture the evidence paints so far about Russia’s interference campaign — and the prognosis for 2018:
1) Russia launched a massive social media campaign to sow discord
An indictment that Mueller secured in February charged 13 Russian nationals and three entities with conducting an illegal “information warfare” effort to disrupt the 2016 presidential election and assist Trump’s candidacy. And it offered a detailed timeline of how the plot occurred — saying the scheme took years to carry out, cost millions of dollars and involved dozens of people, some of whom journeyed to the United States or organized political rallies on American soil.
As early as the spring of 2014, an infamous Russian “troll farm” known as the Internet Research Agency — a company tied to a close Putin associate — devised a strategy using fraudulent bank accounts and other fake identify documents to “spread distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general.”
The IRA also started an operation that used Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube to influence the U.S. voting public, mostly through thousands of fake “bot” accounts and misleading advertising, according to the Mueller indictment. For example, IRA trolls produced materials intended to promote pro-Trump and anti-Clinton hashtags on Twitter, including #TrumpTrain, #MAGA and #Hillary4Prison. The alleged trolls also encouraged minority groups either to not vote or to vote for a third-party candidate starting in the latter half of 2016.
More than 80 individuals were allegedly assigned to the team, which “procured and used computer infrastructure, based partly in the United States, to hide the Russian origin of their activities and to avoid detection by U.S. regulators and law enforcement,” the indictment said.
The firm has denied the charges and is challenging the legal basis for the federal indictment.
2) Hackers went after the Democrats
Last week’s indictments against 12 Russian intelligence laid out the other half of the alleged plot: the hacking of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and other liberal political groups, as well as aides to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
The plot included an operation in mid-2016 that injected malware on “at least ten DCCC computers,” which then lurked on the DCCC network, stealing employees’ passwords, the indictment leaks. That allowed the hackers to watch Democratic staffers’ keystrokes and spirit away DCCC files to a server the Russians leased in Arizona.
The hackers then got into the DNC’s computers and transferred several gigabytes of data to a server they leased in Illinois. The hackers also breached the DNC’s Microsoft-hosted email service and stole “thousands of emails” from committee workers, according to the indictment.
The Russians then published their stolen files, using both outlets they created — a website called DC Leaks and a lone-hacker persona called Guccifer 2.0 — as well as an unidentified organization that’s believed to be WikiLeaks. The timing of the releases was no accident, said the indictments, which described private online conversations involving efforts to seize on the “conflict between bernie and hillary” before the Democratic National Convention.
The indictment names specific Russian intelligence officers as among the perpetrators, even describing particulars about the hackers’ search histories and Bitcoin transactions.
3) They breached state and county agencies, too
“Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment,” the U.S. intelligence community said in its initial assessment of Russian activities before the elections. Then, according to multiple accounts of Russian activity to interfere with the 2016 vote, they put that knowledge to use.
“The Kremlin’s campaign aimed at the US election featured disclosures of data obtained through Russian cyber operations; intrusions into US state and local electoral boards; and overt propaganda,” according to the intelligence agencies’ assessment, which Trump himself has said he backs.
The FBI went public about the threat roughly two months before the 2016 election, issuing a nationwide warning about possible attempts to hack state election offices after intruders hacked voter registration databases in Illinois and Arizona. But it wasn’t until January 2017 that the government blamed Russian operatives for those attacks and accused the Kremlin of targeting 21 states’ election systems.
The latest Mueller indictment added more details, such as a July 2016 breach in which hackers stole information on 500,000 voters from an unnamed state election office’s website, including their names, addresses, partial Social Security numbers, birthdays and driver’s license numbers. That state is probably Illinois, which has acknowledged such a compromise.
The charges also say that Russians “visited the websites of certain counties in Georgia, Iowa and Florida to identify vulnerabilities.”
Furthermore, the indictment says, Russians breached an unidentified company that sells voter registration software and then posed as an employee of that company in “over 100” fake messages to election administrators in several Florida counties. Those emails contained malicious software embedded in Word documents.
4) Warning: Moscow is still trying
Both Mueller and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats have said the Russian efforts are continuing.
“It is 2018, and we continue to see Russian targeting of American society in ways that could affect our midterm elections,” Coats said during an early June appearance in France. He offered a less-specific warning last week, saying that “today, the digital infrastructure that serves this country is literally under attack” — comparing the threat of cyberattacks to what America faced before 9/11.
Mueller’s office offered a similar caution in a court filing in June, writing that “uncharged individuals and entities … are continuing to engage in interference operations like those” outlined in February’s indictment on social media trolling and fake news.
Neither Coats nor Mueller has offered a public explanation of what kind of threat they’re talking about, and lawmakers have complained that the Trump administration is keeping them in the dark. Officials from the Department of Homeland Security say they haven’t seen any evidence of digital tampering with election organizations, individuals or systems — though that doesn’t rule out some broader effort to undermine public faith in the U.S. political system or sow unrest.
5) States aren’t ready for November
According to a POLITICO survey of election upgrades in all 50 states, most states’ election offices have failed to fix their most glaring security weaknesses and few states are planning steps that would improve their safeguards before November. That’s even after they receive their shares of the $380 million in election security funding that Congress approved in March.
Only 13 states said they intend to use the federal dollars to buy new voting machines. At least 22 said they have no plans to replace their machines before the election — including all five states that rely solely on paperless electronic voting devices, which cybersecurity experts consider a top vulnerability.
In addition, almost no states conduct robust, statistics-based post-election audits to look for evidence of tampering after the fact. And fewer than one-third of states and territories have requested a key type of security review from DHS.
At least one lawmaker is pushing her state to do more — faster. In response to a recent House Democratic report that called out Illinois and several states for not doing enough to bolster election security, Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.) said in a letter to Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner that her state’s efforts were “deeply disturbing and cause for great concern.”
Eric Geller, Michael Crowley, Louis Nelson, Brianna Milord and Maria Curi contributed to this report.
|Congress must catch up to voters on marijuana issue The Hill (blog)Medical marijuana: What you really need to know New ScientistMedical marijuana users brace for tax hike CBC.caFull coverage|
|Senate Democrats want to question Trump’s interpreter at Putin summit ABC NewsDemocrats Call On Trump-Putin Interpreter to Testify, Republicans Say No Roll CallDemocrats want Trump’s interpreter to testify before Congress STLtoday.comWhat did Trump promise Putin? Bring his interpreter to Congress & find out, Democrats insist RTFull coverage|
Food technology company Mosa Meat is hoping to bring its lab-grown meat to the market in 2021, it has announced. The company, which is located in the Netherlands, has raised about $8.7 million dollars to help fund its goal, which will involve developing a way to produce the meat at a much lower cost than existing methods. The goal highlights … Continue reading
House Democrats have finalized their campaign slogan heading into the last months before the midterm election: “For the People.”
The new motto, which Democratic leaders unveiled in a private meeting with members Wednesday morning, is meant to put a finer point on the broad economic-based messaging Democrats have been pushing with mixed success since last summer. That initial message — a “Better Deal” — has largely failed to break through with voters and has been openly mocked by some Democratic lawmakers.
House Democrats plan to begin working “For the People” into their statements and press conferences, with a focus on three key areas: addressing health care and prescription drug costs; increasing wages through infrastructure and public works projects; and highlighting Republican corruption in Washington.
“We have 110 days from right now until Election Day and we will be spending the month of August in our home districts and we wanted to make sure we are singing from the same song sheet on the three top issues,” Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), co-chair of House Democrats’ messaging arm, said in an interview.
Bustos and her co-chairmen, Reps. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), met with the various House Democratic caucuses multiple times in recent months to solicit input on how Democrats should package their campaign themes in the final weeks before the midterms.
Democrats have struggled to chart a course since the 2016 election, with centrists and liberals fighting for the party’s identity and leadership frequently frustrated in their attempts to cut through the daily noise generated by President Donald Trump.
“I don’t think any of us are claiming this is poetic or this is the end-all-be-all of messaging,” Bustos said. “It’s just a way, in a quick way, to put together the answer to what we stand for.”
Bustos emphasized the simplicity of the message and said focusing on a trio of specific policy areas that Trump has failed to deliver on would allow Democrats to present a clear contrast with the president while also offering voters forward-looking ideas — something they believe they failed to do in 2016.
“Those are three promises that this president made to the American people that he has not kept. Sometimes you have to clearly and simply point out how we’re different,” Bustos said. “With discipline and not being distracted by the outrage of the day, that’s how people can start hearing us.”
Democrats openly blame themselves for failing to reach the working-class voters who helped put Trump in the White House and have promised to do better than just “run against Trump” in this year’s election.
But privately Democrats say it’s unlikely either party’s message will sway the outcome of the election.
Democrats are in their best position in nearly a decade to regain control of the House largely because of an energized anti-Trump base seeking a check on the president. Midterms also historically favor the party not in control of the White House.
Still, Democratic sources who attended Wednesday’s meeting said the presentation went over well with members in the room — a contrast to the eye rolling by some lawmakers after last year’s messaging reveal.
And unlike the splashy rollout that accompanied “Better Deal,” which Democratic leaders from both chambers unveiled in a battleground House district in rural Virginia last July, their latest shift will be more low key. They aren’t expected to hold a press conference or make an official announcement on it.
The pivot to “For the People” could also help House Democrats put some daylight between them and the GOP. House Republicans have been running on their own “better”-based campaign slogans in the last two election cycles — “A Better Way” in 2016 and the GOP’s recently unveiled 2018 slogan, “Better Off Now.”
“We basically put it all on paper to say here are our top issues — they’re simple, they’re easy to understand,” Bustos said. “That’s how you break through this tweet machine coming out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.”
President’s response comes a week after the top US intelligence officer cautioned that Russia is still a persistent threat
Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he does not believe Russia is still targeting the United States, directly contradicting the nation’s top intelligence officer, who said Moscow continues to attack America’s electoral system.
When asked directly by reporters whether he believed Russia was “still targeting the US”, Trump responded: “No.”